| ||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
(#1)
|
(#2)
|
| Operations Manager Posts: 5,033 Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: United Kingdom |
17-05-2007, 11:03 PM
Hi Nibb, I am afraid not. A full spam filter is planned for Version 4, but beyond effective parser rules I cannot think of anything else. I am personally working on a simple spam filter for comments and tickets and have been for some months; but development on this is slow due to time constraints and I cannot guarantee it's arrival. -------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | |
(#3)
|
(#4)
|
| Operations Manager Posts: 5,033 Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: United Kingdom |
17-05-2007, 11:57 PM
Direct piping is indeed the most efficient all around but you could simply try out POP3 polling and see how it works for you. In this case, I suggest you look at BoxTrapper. You could also look at stopping new ticket creations by e-mail, requiring your users to create new tickets via your website. You could then allow ticket replies via e-mail, with a valid ticket ID. This can be set up using the Is Ticket Reply parser rule. -------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | |
(#5)
|
| Community Moderator Posts: 676 Join Date: Jan 2005 |
18-05-2007, 12:56 AM
Rather than boxtrapper (which I personally despise), you might consider installing mailscanner: http://www.mailscanner.info/ It interacts directly with Exim and sees all mail before delivering to pipes or mailboxes. Of all the mail entering a server each day, we easily remove 80+% of the obvious junk each day to the server, and tag the ones that aren't obvious for further filtering. You could set Kayako to flag junk messages with the default {Spam?} tag in the subject for a particular department and check it only once a day or even just ignore it completely. Pretty effective, I must say. I tested for a few weeks and never once saw a legitimate message tagged as obvious spam, and only a handful that were false positives at the lower level where it just tags it. |
| | |
(#6)
|
(#7)
|
| Senior Member Posts: 5,328 Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Cumbria, UK |
21-05-2007, 08:15 AM
Personally I think opening an account at FuseMail (http://www.fusemail.com), changing the MX records on your domain to theirs and then pulling the mail from their servers would be the best route. I have used them for 2 years now and their spam filtering is great. Icon Headquarters - Its Elixir - Web2Messenger |
| | |
(#8)
|
(#9)
|
(#10)
|
| Senior Member Posts: 5,328 Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Cumbria, UK |
10-07-2007, 07:27 PM
Is it in the manual about putting it through the spam filter first? If not it should be. Icon Headquarters - Its Elixir - Web2Messenger |
| | |
(#11)
|
(#12)
|
| Operations Manager Posts: 5,033 Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: United Kingdom |
10-07-2007, 08:13 PM
You have to remember that the Gmail filter is for the masses - most well written filters that can train to your scenario and situation is going to be better than a 'global' one. -------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | |
(#13)
|
(#14)
|
| Senior Member Posts: 5,328 Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Cumbria, UK |
16-07-2007, 10:54 AM
Have you got comments to knowledge base articles set to moderation mode? This way you can accept and deny comments. Icon Headquarters - Its Elixir - Web2Messenger |
| | |
(#15)
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| spam |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
| |