(split) Version numbering discussion (old)

WireNine · **(split) Version numbering discussion (old) -** 29-03-2007, 10:31 PM

Any idea about v4, when is this coming? I have requested this feature also before.

Andrew.S · 29-03-2007, 10:32 PM

I dont know But Steve might know.

**Digital Mayhem** · 29-03-2007, 11:07 PM

no clue but wouldn't expect it within the next year.

**Jamie Edwards** · 11:36 PM

Version 4 shouldn't be an awful long time away, but Version 3.5 is due out before it, which will be another milestone.

WireNine · 30-03-2007, 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamie Edwards

Version 4 shouldn't be an awful long time away, but Version 3.5 is due out before it, which will be another milestone.

I am guessing perhaps near the end of 2008? and 3.5 near the end of 2007 since we are only at 3.1.

**Jamie Edwards** · 30-03-2007, 04:09 PM

I cannot give any definite estimates, but I can say that you do not necessarily have to wait for 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 until you get the 3.5 (and so on). The version number changes will simply mark the significance of each update.

netFusion · 03-04-2007, 06:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jamie Edwards

Version 4 shouldn't be an awful long time away, but Version 3.5 is due out before it, which will be another milestone.

Will we see any of the missing v2 features in v3.5 or v4? Why is 3.5 a milestone?

netFusion · 03-04-2007, 06:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WireNine

I am guessing perhaps near the end of 2008? and 3.5 near the end of 2007 since we are only at 3.1.

Actually, if you look at the version numbers, we are at 3.10 (three point ten) rather than 3.1, so we are already past 3.5.

Or would that be 3.50 (three point fifty)?

I know, Kayako refers to the ten as being one.... I just find it humorous...

**Jamie Edwards** · 03-04-2007, 09:07 AM

netFusion;

Quote:

Actually, if you look at the version numbers, we are at 3.10 (three point ten) rather than 3.1, so we are already past 3.5.

Or would that be 3.50 (three point fifty)?

This inconsistency is probably only down to shorter-hand communication on the forum

abfm · 03-04-2007, 10:48 AM

3.1000000000000 is smaller than 3.5

WireNine · 12-04-2007, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by netFusion

Actually, if you look at the version numbers, we are at 3.10 (three point ten) rather than 3.1, so we are already past 3.5.

Or would that be 3.50 (three point fifty)?

I know, Kayako refers to the ten as being one.... I just find it humorous...

Obviously kayako does not know how to properly version their releases if what you say is true.

When you get to 3.9, the next version would be 4.00 not 3.10. As abfm mentioned above 3.1 is smaller than 3.5, the version number should be moving upwards.

supportskins · 12-04-2007, 09:40 AM

Didn't they number the version as 3.00.90 and not 3.9?

**Jamie Edwards** · 12-04-2007, 10:12 AM

That is correct, we have:

3.00.90 - 24 Jul 2006 01:12 AM
3.02.00 - 11 Sep 2006 10:20 PM
3.04.00 - 06 Oct 2006 01:12 AM
3.04.51 - 09 Jan 2007 01:14 AM
3.10.00 - 28 Feb 2007 09:28 PM

And so on

supportskins · 12-04-2007, 01:14 PM

Right, numbering the version may be wierd but it is certainly not insane. It does move ahead.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Problems with index.php and swift.php	Paul Westhead	Technical Chat	15	05-09-2008 07:21 PM
PHP4 vs. PHP5 and doing better version numbering	dschargel	SupportSuite, eSupport and LiveResponse	20	18-05-2008 09:54 PM

WireNine Offline Member Posts: 88 Join Date: Feb 2006	(split) Version numbering discussion (old) - 29-03-2007, 10:31 PM Any idea about v4, when is this coming? I have requested this feature also before. Ali Khan – Founder and CEO, WireNine.com ╘WireNine ● Superior Hosting Solutions ● cPanel Shared and Reseller Web Hosting ● Cpanel/WHM ● RvSkins ● Fantastico de Luxe

Andrew.S Offline Member Posts: 45 Join Date: May 2006	29-03-2007, 10:32 PM I dont know But Steve might know.

Digital Mayhem Offline Community Moderator Posts: 889 Join Date: May 2005 Location: Henderson, Nevada	29-03-2007, 11:07 PM no clue but wouldn't expect it within the next year. Steve Digital Mayhem, Inc. AIM: Steve.Lawrence@Digital-Mayhem.com MSN: Steve.Lawrence@Digital-Mayhem.com GTALK: Steve.Lawrence@Digital-Mayhem.com YAHOO: DigitalMayhem_Steve SKYPE: DigitalMayhem_Steve I'm Important Posting & You

abfm Offline New Member Posts: 27 Join Date: Jan 2007	03-04-2007, 10:48 AM 3.1000000000000 is smaller than 3.5

supportskins Online Senior Member Posts: 3,861 Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Mumbai, India	12-04-2007, 09:40 AM Didn't they number the version as 3.00.90 and not 3.9? Professional and Affordable Kayako Skins - Specialists in Kayako Skinning & Customization - Professional Paid Support Our Skins and Services - http://www.supportskins.com/store/ SupportSkins.com - http://www.supportskins.com/

supportskins Online Senior Member Posts: 3,861 Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Mumbai, India	12-04-2007, 01:14 PM Right, numbering the version may be wierd but it is certainly not insane. It does move ahead. Professional and Affordable Kayako Skins - Specialists in Kayako Skinning & Customization - Professional Paid Support Our Skins and Services - http://www.supportskins.com/store/ SupportSkins.com - http://www.supportskins.com/