When are we going to see a new STABLE Build?

Viscott · **When are we going to see a new STABLE Build? -** 03-03-2006, 06:20 PM

It has been nothng but CVS builds for over 2 months now since December 19th 3.00.32 build.

When are we going to see a new STABLE Build?

Neil-UKWSD · 03-03-2006, 08:22 PM

Hi,

There is a further CVS build coming so that the fixes/changes in that can be tested by those who wish to run the CVS prior to it being marked as a stable build.

If nothing major crops up it will be declared stable a week or so later.

***Varun Shoor*** · 03-03-2006, 09:08 PM

We are at it, New rewritten flood protection to support mail parser rules is whats taking time.

Regards,

Varun Shoor

jaga · 04-03-2006, 01:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Varun [K]

We are at it, New rewritten flood protection to support mail parser rules is whats taking time.

Regards,

Varun Shoor

<fingers crossed>
Does it, by chance, include new features such as the ability to match, capture, and add non-supportsuite addresses to the ticket as recipients?
</figers crossed>

WireNine · 04-03-2006, 02:38 AM

Instead of new features, more interested in bug fixes and improvements to the liveresponse.

internut33 · 04-03-2006, 06:22 PM

I believe this is what they're doing currently. Though I'd like to see more releases as "critical" features get fixed. Not wait for a new relase that has like 100 bug fixes.

I'm using .33 and the system is doing me jsut fine. I do have some issues such as:

Downloads area is not showning anything. Well it displays categories and the count # of downloads available. But no actual file links afe shown. Can get to the file dowload page from the index "avaiable files" link.

Jason

Doug I. · 05-03-2006, 06:59 AM

I agree 100% Jason. Kayako, I have been waiting a long time for your next release. You guys really have to put out smaller critical updates, and stop trying to drop a bomb on us with a supposed 100+ fixes.
There is bound to be regressions, and then we may have to wait several more weeks if one of the regressions is critical to our operation.
The more smaller patches you put out, the more you will pacify your client base. I don't think any user would have a complaint about small releases.

Please find a good spot to stop development and make a release. I am really getting tired of it myself and I have probably been 10x more patient than the posters on this NG.

Please.... Pretty Please... Please... I am begging you... Please.

***Varun Shoor*** · 06-03-2006, 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doug I.

I agree 100% Jason. Kayako, I have been waiting a long time for your next release. You guys really have to put out smaller critical updates, and stop trying to drop a bomb on us with a supposed 100+ fixes.
There is bound to be regressions, and then we may have to wait several more weeks if one of the regressions is critical to our operation.
The more smaller patches you put out, the more you will pacify your client base. I don't think any user would have a complaint about small releases.

Please find a good spot to stop development and make a release. I am really getting tired of it myself and I have probably been 10x more patient than the posters on this NG.

Please.... Pretty Please... Please... I am begging you... Please.

We are in a Catch 22 Situtation, If we release regular updates people get angry and tell us not to do so as they have to upgrade every week. We did try this in December if you remember.

Now if we send out one big update people say we arent developing enough. What do you recommend we do?

Regards,

Varun Shoor

ehoffman · 06-03-2006, 11:14 PM

Is an option sometimes Varun to run a CVS build if you are desparate for some fixes, or not recommended?

***Varun Shoor*** · 07-03-2006, 12:08 AM

You are free to upgrade to CVS at any time, Our main helpdesk installation almost always uses CVS builds.

Regards,

Varun Shoor

acidbox · 07-03-2006, 04:26 AM

I prefer less frequent large updates instead of the quicker small updates, mainly because reverting templates and re-doing them is such a pain.

WireNine · 07-03-2006, 08:29 AM

As long as there are more bug fixes, frequent large updates or quicker small updates do not matter to me.

phalseid · 07-03-2006, 04:59 PM

what about us leased folks? when do we get an update? im not even sure what version we are running anymore? all i know is Advanced Search doesn't find criteria spcified in the body of a message. Anyone else have this issue?

justin · 07-03-2006, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Varun [K]

We are in a Catch 22 Situtation, If we release regular updates people get angry and tell us not to do so as they have to upgrade every week. We did try this in December if you remember.

Now if we send out one big update people say we arent developing enough. What do you recommend we do?

Regards,

Varun Shoor

Heres the thing. Releasing small updates gives those who want bugs fixed the ability to update. Not releasing gives them no other options(other then taking a chance with CVS). No one is forcing people to upgrade their installs, so the people who complain about too many updates don't need to update. Perhaps having 3 releases

1) Unstable
2) Stable - Bug Fixes
3) Stable - Bug Fixes + New Features

jaga · 07-03-2006, 10:00 PM

My vote is to create cvs builds either nightly or for each checkin, and every so often (every couple months or so) do a feature freeze and start squashing bugs for a new release.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
New Build 3.11.01 STABLE	Ryan Lederman	News and Announcements	0	28-08-2007 05:00 PM
New Build: 3.11.00 STABLE	Jamie Edwards	News and Announcements	1	06-08-2007 09:02 PM
New Build: 3.10.02 STABLE	Ryan Lederman	News and Announcements	0	05-03-2007 09:53 PM
New Stable Build A Myth?	Elite	Comments, Questions & Feedback	2	31-01-2007 06:40 PM
Which build is more stable?	caitlyntw	SupportSuite, eSupport and LiveResponse	5	30-12-2006 02:49 AM

Viscott Offline Member Posts: 39 Join Date: Jan 2005	When are we going to see a new STABLE Build? - 03-03-2006, 06:20 PM It has been nothng but CVS builds for over 2 months now since December 19th 3.00.32 build. When are we going to see a new STABLE Build?

Neil-UKWSD Offline Member Posts: 865 Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: United Kingdom	03-03-2006, 08:22 PM Hi, There is a further CVS build coming so that the fixes/changes in that can be tested by those who wish to run the CVS prior to it being marked as a stable build. If nothing major crops up it will be declared stable a week or so later. Neil Wood \| UK Web.Solutions Direct Ltd UK cPanel/WHM hosting accounts http://ukwebsolutionsdirect.co.uk

WireNine Offline Member Posts: 86 Join Date: Feb 2006	04-03-2006, 02:38 AM Instead of new features, more interested in bug fixes and improvements to the liveresponse.

ehoffman Offline Member Posts: 200 Join Date: Dec 2005	06-03-2006, 11:14 PM Is an option sometimes Varun to run a CVS build if you are desparate for some fixes, or not recommended? ------------- Eric Managing Partner EJH & Associates Latest Stable Support Suite Owned (with 7 domains)

acidbox Offline Member Posts: 35 Join Date: Sep 2005	07-03-2006, 04:26 AM I prefer less frequent large updates instead of the quicker small updates, mainly because reverting templates and re-doing them is such a pain.

WireNine Offline Member Posts: 86 Join Date: Feb 2006	07-03-2006, 08:29 AM As long as there are more bug fixes, frequent large updates or quicker small updates do not matter to me.

jaga Offline Member Posts: 54 Join Date: Nov 2005	07-03-2006, 10:00 PM My vote is to create cvs builds either nightly or for each checkin, and every so often (every couple months or so) do a feature freeze and start squashing bugs for a new release.